Data Synthesis Strategies¶
new in 0.6.0
pandera provides a utility for generating synthetic data purely from
pandera schema or schema component objects. Under the hood, the schema metadata
is collected to create a data-generating strategy using
hypothesis, which is a
property-based testing library.
Basic Usage¶
Once you’ve defined a schema, it’s easy to generate examples:
import pandera.pandas as pa
schema = pa.DataFrameSchema(
{
"column1": pa.Column(int, pa.Check.eq(10)),
"column2": pa.Column(float, pa.Check.eq(0.25)),
"column3": pa.Column(str, pa.Check.eq("foo")),
}
)
schema.example(size=3)
| column1 | column2 | column3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 0.25 | foo |
| 1 | 10 | 0.25 | foo |
| 2 | 10 | 0.25 | foo |
Note that here we’ve constrained the specific values in each column using
Check s in order to make the data generation process
deterministic for documentation purposes.
Usage in Unit Tests¶
The example method is available for all schemas and schema components, and
is primarily meant to be used interactively. It could be used in a script to
generate test cases, but hypothesis recommends against doing this and
instead using the strategy method to create a hypothesis strategy
that can be used in pytest unit tests.
import hypothesis
def processing_fn(df):
return df.assign(column4=df.column1 * df.column2)
@hypothesis.given(schema.strategy(size=5))
def test_processing_fn(dataframe):
result = processing_fn(dataframe)
assert "column4" in result
The above example is trivial, but you get the idea! Schema objects can create
a strategy that can then be collected by a pytest
runner. We could also run the tests explicitly ourselves, or run it as a
unittest.TestCase. For more information on testing with hypothesis, see the
hypothesis quick start guide.
A more practical example involves using
schema transformations. We can modify
the function above to make sure that processing_fn actually outputs the
correct result:
out_schema = schema.add_columns({"column4": pa.Column(float)})
@pa.check_output(out_schema)
def processing_fn(df):
return df.assign(column4=df.column1 * df.column2)
@hypothesis.given(schema.strategy(size=5))
def test_processing_fn(dataframe):
processing_fn(dataframe)
Now the test_processing_fn simply becomes an execution test, raising a
SchemaError if processing_fn doesn’t add
column4 to the dataframe.
Strategies and Examples from DataFrame Models¶
You can also use the class-based API to generate examples. Here’s the equivalent dataframe model for the above examples:
from pandera.typing import Series, DataFrame
class InSchema(pa.DataFrameModel):
column1: Series[int] = pa.Field(eq=10)
column2: Series[float] = pa.Field(eq=0.25)
column3: Series[str] = pa.Field(eq="foo")
class OutSchema(InSchema):
column4: Series[float]
@pa.check_types
def processing_fn(df: DataFrame[InSchema]) -> DataFrame[OutSchema]:
return df.assign(column4=df.column1 * df.column2)
@hypothesis.given(InSchema.strategy(size=5))
def test_processing_fn(dataframe):
processing_fn(dataframe)
Checks as Constraints¶
As you may have noticed in the first example, Check s
further constrain the data synthesized from a strategy. Without checks, the
example method would simply generate any value of the specified type. You
can specify multiple checks on a column and pandera should be able to
generate valid data under those constraints.
schema_multiple_checks = pa.DataFrameSchema({
"column1": pa.Column(
float, checks=[
pa.Check.gt(0),
pa.Check.lt(1e10),
pa.Check.notin([-100, -10, 0]),
]
)
})
for _ in range(5):
# generate 10 rows of the dataframe
sample_data = schema_multiple_checks.example(size=3)
# validate the sampled data
schema_multiple_checks(sample_data)
One caveat here is that it’s up to you to define a set of checks that are
jointly satisfiable. If not, an Unsatisfiable exception will be raised:
import hypothesis
schema_multiple_checks = pa.DataFrameSchema({
"column1": pa.Column(
float, checks=[
# nonsensical constraints
pa.Check.gt(0),
pa.Check.lt(-10),
]
)
})
schema_multiple_checks.example(size=3)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsatisfiable Traceback (most recent call last)
Cell In[6], line 13
1 import hypothesis
3 schema_multiple_checks = pa.DataFrameSchema({
4 "column1": pa.Column(
5 float, checks=[
(...) 10 )
11 })
---> 13 schema_multiple_checks.example(size=3)
File ~/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/pandera/checkouts/v0.27.1/pandera/api/pandas/container.py:207, in DataFrameSchema.example(self, size, n_regex_columns)
200 with warnings.catch_warnings():
201 warnings.simplefilter(
202 "ignore",
203 category=hypothesis.errors.NonInteractiveExampleWarning,
204 )
205 return self.strategy(
206 size=size, n_regex_columns=n_regex_columns
--> 207 ).example()
File ~/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/pandera/envs/v0.27.1/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hypothesis/strategies/_internal/strategies.py:363, in SearchStrategy.example(self)
346 @given(self)
347 @settings(
348 database=None,
(...) 359 ex: Ex, # type: ignore # mypy is overzealous in preventing covariant params
360 ) -> None:
361 self.__examples.append(ex)
--> 363 example_generating_inner_function()
364 shuffle(self.__examples)
365 return self.__examples.pop()
File ~/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/pandera/envs/v0.27.1/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hypothesis/strategies/_internal/strategies.py:347, in SearchStrategy.example.<locals>.example_generating_inner_function()
342 from hypothesis.core import given
344 # Note: this function has a weird name because it might appear in
345 # tracebacks, and we want users to know that they can ignore it.
346 @given(self)
--> 347 @settings(
348 database=None,
349 # generate only a few examples at a time to avoid slow interactivity
350 # for large strategies. The overhead of @given is very small relative
351 # to generation, so a small batch size is fine.
352 max_examples=10,
353 deadline=None,
354 verbosity=Verbosity.quiet,
355 phases=(Phase.generate,),
356 suppress_health_check=list(HealthCheck),
357 )
358 def example_generating_inner_function(
359 ex: Ex, # type: ignore # mypy is overzealous in preventing covariant params
360 ) -> None:
361 self.__examples.append(ex)
363 example_generating_inner_function()
[... skipping hidden 1 frame]
File ~/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/pandera/envs/v0.27.1/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hypothesis/core.py:1439, in StateForActualGivenExecution.run_engine(self)
1433 explanations.append(
1434 f"{runner.overrun_examples} of {runner.call_count} "
1435 "examples were too large to finish generating; try "
1436 "reducing the typical size of your inputs?"
1437 )
1438 rep = get_pretty_function_description(self.test)
-> 1439 raise Unsatisfiable(
1440 f"Unable to satisfy assumptions of {rep}. "
1441 f"{' Also, '.join(explanations)}"
1442 )
1444 # If we have not traced executions, warn about that now (but only when
1445 # we'd expect to do so reliably, i.e. on CPython>=3.12)
1446 if (
1447 hasattr(sys, "monitoring")
1448 and not PYPY
(...) 1451 ): # pragma: no cover
1452 # actually covered by our tests, but only on >= 3.12
Unsatisfiable: Unable to satisfy assumptions of example_generating_inner_function. 1000 of 1000 examples failed a .filter() or assume() condition. Try making your filters or assumes less strict, or rewrite using strategy parameters: st.integers().filter(lambda x: x > 0) fails less often (that is, never) when rewritten as st.integers(min_value=1).
Check Strategy Chaining¶
If you specify multiple checks for a particular column, this is what happens under the hood:
The first check in the list is the base strategy, which
hypothesisuses to generate data.All subsequent checks filter the values generated by the previous strategy such that it fulfills the constraints of current check.
To optimize efficiency of the data-generation procedure, make sure to specify the most restrictive constraint of a column as the base strategy and build other constraints on top of it.
In-line Custom Checks¶
One of the strengths of pandera is its flexibility with regard to defining
custom checks on the fly:
schema_inline_check = pa.DataFrameSchema({
"col": pa.Column(str, pa.Check(lambda s: s.isin({"foo", "bar"})))
})
One of the disadvantages of this is that the fallback strategy is to simply
apply the check to the generated data, which can be highly inefficient. In this
case, hypothesis will generate strings and try to find examples of strings
that are in the set {"foo", "bar"}, which will be very slow and most likely
raise an Unsatisfiable exception. To get around this limitation, you can
register custom checks and define strategies that correspond to them.
Defining Custom Strategies via the strategy kwarg¶
The Check constructor exposes a strategy
keyword argument that allows you to define a data synthesis strategy that can
work as a base strategy or chained strategy. For example, suppose you define
a custom check that makes sure values in a column are in some specified range.
check = pa.Check(lambda x: x.between(0, 100))
You can then define a strategy for this check with:
import pandera.strategies.pandas_strategies as st
def in_range_strategy(pandera_dtype, strategy=None):
if strategy is None:
# handle base strategy case
return st.floats(min_value=min_val, max_value=max_val).map(
# the map isn't strictly necessary, but shows an example of
# using the pandera_dtype argument
strategies.to_numpy_dtype(pandera_dtype).type
)
# handle chained strategy case
return strategy.filter(lambda val: 0 <= val <= 10)
check = pa.Check(lambda x: x.between(0, 100), strategy=in_range_strategy)
Notice that the in_range_strategy function takes two arguments: pandera_dtype,
and strategy. pandera_dtype is required, since this is almost always
required information when generating data. The strategy argument is optional,
where the default case assumes a base strategy, where the check is specified
as the first one in the list of checks specified at the column- or dataframe- level.
Defining Custom Strategies via Check Registration¶
All built-in Check s are associated with a data
synthesis strategy. You can define your own data synthesis strategies by using
the extensions API to register a custom check function with
a corresponding strategy.